New Demon Hunter Spell - All Fel Breaks Loose

Murder at Castle Nathria
  • Arthas's Avatar
    Black Lotus 1215 4978 Posts Joined 03/10/2019
    Posted 4 months, 1 week ago

    A new Common Demon Hunter Spell, All Fel Breaks Loose, has been revealed!

    All Fel Breaks Loose Card Image

    Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


    Learn more about Murder at Castle Nathria

    Head on over to our dedicated guide for Murder at Castle Nathria!


    Get Cheaper Card Packs

    This section contains affiliate links.

    If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

    Your friendly neighbourhood bot!
    Like what I'm doing? Disable ads and unlock cosmetics with Out of Cards Premium!

    0
  • dapperdog's Avatar
    Dragon Scholar 1810 4684 Posts Joined 07/29/2019
    Posted 4 months, 1 week ago

    Its fairly bad. In big decks, this card is just sitting around until about turn 9 while the conditions hinder its consistency.

    There's some synergy here with cards like Masked Reveler and Sigil of Reckoning, getting some big demons out early and playing this around turns 7-8, but its still so slow for today's game. At best in my opinion, this is just a card to get another Illidari Inquisitor or Xhilag of the Abyss, not necessarily to milk as much as possible from it.

    Dont even bother with small demons. 5 mana summon a bunch of 2/2s or 3/3s? Even if all three were Piggyback Imp I'd still be yawning.

    0
  • UVE's Avatar
    1180 826 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
    Quote From dapperdog

    Its fairly bad. In big decks, this card is just sitting around until about turn 9 while the conditions hinder its consistency.

    There's some synergy here with cards like Masked Reveler and Sigil of Reckoning, getting some big demons out early and playing this around turns 7-8, but its still so slow for today's game. At best in my opinion, this is just a card to get another Illidari Inquisitor or Xhilag of the Abyss, not necessarily to milk as much as possible from it.

    Dont even bother with small demons. 5 mana summon a bunch of 2/2s or 3/3s? Even if all three were Piggyback Imp I'd still be yawning.

    Xhilag of the Abyss antisinergizes with that card. The tentacles are demons, so you are polluting the demon pool with 4 useless 1/2.

     

     

    By The Holy Light!

    0
  • dapperdog's Avatar
    Dragon Scholar 1810 4684 Posts Joined 07/29/2019
    Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
    Quote From UVE
    Quote From dapperdog

    Its fairly bad. In big decks, this card is just sitting around until about turn 9 while the conditions hinder its consistency.

    There's some synergy here with cards like Masked Reveler and Sigil of Reckoning, getting some big demons out early and playing this around turns 7-8, but its still so slow for today's game. At best in my opinion, this is just a card to get another Illidari Inquisitor or Xhilag of the Abyss, not necessarily to milk as much as possible from it.

    Dont even bother with small demons. 5 mana summon a bunch of 2/2s or 3/3s? Even if all three were Piggyback Imp I'd still be yawning.

    Xhilag of the Abyss antisinergizes with that card. The tentacles are demons, so you are polluting the demon pool with 4 useless 1/2.

    You'll fully infuse it with xhilag's tentacles and have a 60% chance of getting it back from this one card. Not too bad a deal. I simply dont think this card is any good in a real big demon deck, because its just way too slow. If this card gets you another xhilag often enough, why not? At very worse, that's still 6 damage.

    But of course, if somehow this card gets on big decks, then xhilag would be counter productive, on that I'll agree.

    0
  • Leave a Comment

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.