I've always considered MtG the better game. and i still do. Doesnt mean im playing it, quiet the contrary, f2p model is something that needs to be balanced and yes LoR takes the cake there but then u need to compare other aspect as well.
At the end of the day HS is in a great spot specially for the last year or two even with the whole DH op thing and the tavern pass scandal. being able to adapt quickly and improve and coming up with new stuff is what makes a game great and HS is pulling out all the stops on that one.
yes theres a new minions paladin deck that doesnt rely on the secret package. its an aggro tempo based deck
yeah i wouldnt try poison rogue not to mention is basically a buff weapon ignore everything else and go face. i mean they even run cloack of shadows just so that they keep ignoring the match and keep going face, like its the most basic of aggro, in comparison face hunter takes a bit more skill to it at times
anyways, if u have the dust or cards i would say Rush Warrior. its not full on aggro, it has its nuances to learn, especially vs priest since its a bad matchup and it tramples over face hunter if played correctly. it has a very even spread matchup. try it out if u can.
but every deck has hard counters. this is a system that has thrived in MTG for decades, tho i guess comparing this 2 games isnt exactly fair.
control warlock has a polarizing match spread. there are decks out there that can have a nicely even spread, even with one hard counter. thing is these best decks are either tempo hyper aggro or midrange. those are the ones that have a shot against most match ups from what im seeing.
u need to embrace all archetypes, not just the control variant, or else the game is gonna piss you off. i was once like that, only control always. i decided to play the others and i still enjoy the game.
yes control has a more precise feel to it. not just playing green cards thinking a bit before u play card and open your browser . but alas its what we have, we need to adapt or im afraid that u will never enjoy the game again.
considering last expansions i do believe the game is walking away from a control perspective. even the control warrior we had was basically just like this midrange rush but with extra steps, i mean Rattlegore was already being dropped.
control warlock is the only deck that exists right now that has the classic, stall removal and drop big late bombs to close the game including a hero card providing never end 6/6 minion. and also screws with opponents deck with tickatus.
yeah it gets chewed up by aggro hunter but i think thats a good thing, cause usually control cant deal with hyper aggro, only in HS that was available. HS is turning away from that and embracing the old and classic way of control beats midrange beats aggro beats control
dont play Priest then and i would not advice Ilucia, its a very hard card to play and i think its a good tech vs TIckatus but its quite hard to know when to play it specially cause u want to get the uncorrupt version which is very hard to do with the mana available.
control isnt very viable right now in standard. not sure about wild. control warlock is the one that exists alongside priest.
maybe try OTK DH? not control per se of course but ya know it has its moments
actually rush warrior has a hard time to beat priest, check out no hands gamer tutorial on it. i dont know what priest deck are u talking about that cant deal with it. and my guy if u understand counters then why are u jumping decks and complain that u get them all the time?
Kaladin, Rush Warrior is seriously Tier 1. good midrange deck, that can fight off aggro.
its seriously hard to beat priest with it, but overall i think whatever the deck u choose, u need to take into consideration a few things.
first that learning a new deck u gonna take a few losses specially this rush warrior, after u learn the ins and outs u also need to know about ur opponents deck.
Lastly when u change decks its only natural to have a few losses or face counters. problem is u cant just jump decks and then say ur facing counters, u need to stick with one good deck and play it even if at first u lose.
and u cant have a negative mindset not to mention that naturally all decks have counters, so theres no one deck beats all, and just cause of X deck loses to Y it doesnt mean u shouldnt be playing it.
BG's is fun yes. Only one problem tho. its not a card game, its an autobattler, and we are talking about HS card game here. I know they included BG's in the same program as HS but its a different game mode despite what ppl say. its an entirely different game genre
Untrue. Its not auto win cause u need to know how to play it. Ive been playing face hunter for 15 matches and faced 3 control priests and won them all. Played a bit with priest faced 2 aggro hunters and won cause i kept healing every turn BUT mainly cause i know the hunter deck which allowed me to play around and predict their moves.
Honestly playing the decks u need to beat and even hate is the thing that everybody needs to do cause u learn everything about it and it becomes easier to defeat it. In the meantime try rush warrior.
EDIT: This is a reply to Kaladin about priest. Don't know why it appears as a reply to Erodos
sad to hear that. just gotta keep your chin up no matter what. better said than done, but being busy helps. Hope u find a favourite deck soon. good luck
Kaladin, my friend, good to see you in a better mood then before. trust me i know the pain of seeing my opponent winning by topdecking. i literally avoid to see if the card they play is the one they topdeck just so i can keep my sanity.
Anyways...on the topic. Rush warrior is good, theres the normal version that u can find on HSreplay and then theres NoHandsGamer version and i fully trust his judgement: AAECAQcGwN4DxN4D++gDle0DqooEsIoEDLu5A7y5A+LMA93NA6fOA5HQA7PeA7XeA7reA8HeA5HkA5jtAwA=
Usually rush warrior does well against face hunter.
Theres a spicy spell mage deck going around but sadly loses to hunter most of the time : AAECAf0ECI27A9DOA9nRA47UA/vdA4vnA/zoA+fwAwvgzAP4zAOFzQPHzgPNzgOk0QP30QP+0QPQ7APCoATEoAQA
NOW IF YOU WANT TO DUNK ON FACE HUNTER then try Control Priest. its not auto win but its close. AAECAa0GBsi+A/vRA/voA9TtA7SKBMGfBAyTugObugOvugPezAPXzgP+0QPi3gP73wP44wOW6AOe6wOFnwQA
Theres a lot of versions on control priest, some use yogg and cthun other use maly too, check it out on HSreplay, some just use a lower curve and bet on Fortune teller to stomp ppl out. i personally dont like the inclusion of illucia since u got have the reads on ur opponent just use some other stuff
very interesting take yes, and some cool suggestions. Undoubtedly the Nozdormu should be included at some point. I mean Blitz games was immediately suggested by the community on day one of its reveal.
Tinyfin is a great reference to MtG pauper matches, which im totally in for. I agree that theres a lot of different game variants that can be included for standard ladder decks, that doesnt rely on the crazy effects and random stuff that exists in current tavern brawls
why dont they code in for each 15th of the month a special matchmaking where if u Q with Nozdormu u will get paired with another person running it. sure it will take more time to find a person but why not? this way i believe u can Q all u want with Noz and u still wont get a single matched opponent
control priest is heavily underrated. not the spell version, control with xyrella samuro, cthun, some use yogg. it out heals hunter and almost every deck out there. its almost 100% lose to tickatus warlock but has a fair chance against most decks and just crushes face decks
he didnt exactly predict them. before the weekend on his stream he said someone from Blizzard leaked him the nerfs. i dont think he said onn his Ytb video that someone told him, but on stream he did. So his predictions arent exactly that, he plain and simply knew what they where
good good...GOOD. embrace the darkness, play Paladin. i dont condone it, but i dont approve of it either.
Im playing Face Hunter. ppl call me hypocrite. I have no idea why
I've always considered MtG the better game. and i still do. Doesnt mean im playing it, quiet the contrary, f2p model is something that needs to be balanced and yes LoR takes the cake there but then u need to compare other aspect as well.
At the end of the day HS is in a great spot specially for the last year or two even with the whole DH op thing and the tavern pass scandal. being able to adapt quickly and improve and coming up with new stuff is what makes a game great and HS is pulling out all the stops on that one.
yes theres a new minions paladin deck that doesnt rely on the secret package. its an aggro tempo based deck
yeah i wouldnt try poison rogue not to mention is basically a buff weapon ignore everything else and go face. i mean they even run cloack of shadows just so that they keep ignoring the match and keep going face, like its the most basic of aggro, in comparison face hunter takes a bit more skill to it at times
anyways, if u have the dust or cards i would say Rush Warrior. its not full on aggro, it has its nuances to learn, especially vs priest since its a bad matchup and it tramples over face hunter if played correctly. it has a very even spread matchup. try it out if u can.
EDIT: this is the improved version:
AAECAQcGwN4DxN4D++gDle0DqooEsIoEDLu5A7y5A+LMA93NA6fOA5HQA7PeA7XeA7reA8HeA5HkA5jtAwA=
but every deck has hard counters. this is a system that has thrived in MTG for decades, tho i guess comparing this 2 games isnt exactly fair.
control warlock has a polarizing match spread. there are decks out there that can have a nicely even spread, even with one hard counter. thing is these best decks are either tempo hyper aggro or midrange. those are the ones that have a shot against most match ups from what im seeing.
u need to embrace all archetypes, not just the control variant, or else the game is gonna piss you off. i was once like that, only control always. i decided to play the others and i still enjoy the game.
yes control has a more precise feel to it. not just playing green cards thinking a bit before u play card and open your browser . but alas its what we have, we need to adapt or im afraid that u will never enjoy the game again.
considering last expansions i do believe the game is walking away from a control perspective. even the control warrior we had was basically just like this midrange rush but with extra steps, i mean Rattlegore was already being dropped.
control warlock is the only deck that exists right now that has the classic, stall removal and drop big late bombs to close the game including a hero card providing never end 6/6 minion. and also screws with opponents deck with tickatus.
yeah it gets chewed up by aggro hunter but i think thats a good thing, cause usually control cant deal with hyper aggro, only in HS that was available. HS is turning away from that and embracing the old and classic way of control beats midrange beats aggro beats control
dont play Priest then and i would not advice Ilucia, its a very hard card to play and i think its a good tech vs TIckatus but its quite hard to know when to play it specially cause u want to get the uncorrupt version which is very hard to do with the mana available.
control isnt very viable right now in standard. not sure about wild. control warlock is the one that exists alongside priest.
maybe try OTK DH? not control per se of course but ya know it has its moments
actually rush warrior has a hard time to beat priest, check out no hands gamer tutorial on it. i dont know what priest deck are u talking about that cant deal with it. and my guy if u understand counters then why are u jumping decks and complain that u get them all the time?
Kaladin, Rush Warrior is seriously Tier 1. good midrange deck, that can fight off aggro.
its seriously hard to beat priest with it, but overall i think whatever the deck u choose, u need to take into consideration a few things.
first that learning a new deck u gonna take a few losses specially this rush warrior, after u learn the ins and outs u also need to know about ur opponents deck.
Lastly when u change decks its only natural to have a few losses or face counters. problem is u cant just jump decks and then say ur facing counters, u need to stick with one good deck and play it even if at first u lose.
and u cant have a negative mindset not to mention that naturally all decks have counters, so theres no one deck beats all, and just cause of X deck loses to Y it doesnt mean u shouldnt be playing it.
BG's is fun yes. Only one problem tho. its not a card game, its an autobattler, and we are talking about HS card game here. I know they included BG's in the same program as HS but its a different game mode despite what ppl say. its an entirely different game genre
Untrue. Its not auto win cause u need to know how to play it. Ive been playing face hunter for 15 matches and faced 3 control priests and won them all. Played a bit with priest faced 2 aggro hunters and won cause i kept healing every turn BUT mainly cause i know the hunter deck which allowed me to play around and predict their moves.
Honestly playing the decks u need to beat and even hate is the thing that everybody needs to do cause u learn everything about it and it becomes easier to defeat it. In the meantime try rush warrior.
EDIT: This is a reply to Kaladin about priest. Don't know why it appears as a reply to Erodos
sad to hear that. just gotta keep your chin up no matter what. better said than done, but being busy helps. Hope u find a favourite deck soon. good luck
Kaladin, my friend, good to see you in a better mood then before. trust me i know the pain of seeing my opponent winning by topdecking. i literally avoid to see if the card they play is the one they topdeck just so i can keep my sanity.
Anyways...on the topic. Rush warrior is good, theres the normal version that u can find on HSreplay and then theres NoHandsGamer version and i fully trust his judgement: AAECAQcGwN4DxN4D++gDle0DqooEsIoEDLu5A7y5A+LMA93NA6fOA5HQA7PeA7XeA7reA8HeA5HkA5jtAwA=
Usually rush warrior does well against face hunter.
Theres a spicy spell mage deck going around but sadly loses to hunter most of the time : AAECAf0ECI27A9DOA9nRA47UA/vdA4vnA/zoA+fwAwvgzAP4zAOFzQPHzgPNzgOk0QP30QP+0QPQ7APCoATEoAQA
NOW IF YOU WANT TO DUNK ON FACE HUNTER then try Control Priest. its not auto win but its close. AAECAa0GBsi+A/vRA/voA9TtA7SKBMGfBAyTugObugOvugPezAPXzgP+0QPi3gP73wP44wOW6AOe6wOFnwQA
Theres a lot of versions on control priest, some use yogg and cthun other use maly too, check it out on HSreplay, some just use a lower curve and bet on Fortune teller to stomp ppl out. i personally dont like the inclusion of illucia since u got have the reads on ur opponent just use some other stuff
Report back tomorrow with your results. good luck
very interesting take yes, and some cool suggestions. Undoubtedly the Nozdormu should be included at some point. I mean Blitz games was immediately suggested by the community on day one of its reveal.
Tinyfin is a great reference to MtG pauper matches, which im totally in for. I agree that theres a lot of different game variants that can be included for standard ladder decks, that doesnt rely on the crazy effects and random stuff that exists in current tavern brawls
why dont they code in for each 15th of the month a special matchmaking where if u Q with Nozdormu u will get paired with another person running it. sure it will take more time to find a person but why not? this way i believe u can Q all u want with Noz and u still wont get a single matched opponent
control priest is heavily underrated. not the spell version, control with xyrella samuro, cthun, some use yogg. it out heals hunter and almost every deck out there. its almost 100% lose to tickatus warlock but has a fair chance against most decks and just crushes face decks
probably only Warlock
dont sleep on Demons? Demons...
A surprise to be sure but a welcomed one
he didnt exactly predict them. before the weekend on his stream he said someone from Blizzard leaked him the nerfs. i dont think he said onn his Ytb video that someone told him, but on stream he did. So his predictions arent exactly that, he plain and simply knew what they where
Streaming on youtube. Its anti natural