New Warlock Spell - Fiendish Rites

  • Arthas's Avatar 185 459 Posts Joined 03/10/2019
    Posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

    A new Common Warlock Spell, Fiendish Rites, has been revealed!

    Fiendish Rites Card Image

    Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


    Learn more about Descent of Dragons

    Head on over to our dedicated guide for Descent of Dragons!


    Get Cheaper Card Packs

    This section contains affiliate links.

    If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

    1
  • Avalon's Avatar 380 468 Posts Joined 06/12/2019
    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago

    Impferno has seen zero play and this card is not really different from it.

    I guess it will all come down to how much Galakrond will be good

    -1
  • DoubleSummon's Avatar 455 636 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago

    the 2 warlock invoke cards seem really weak, wonder what is the galakrond hero power for warlock it's better be good.

    if not it feels bad warlock gets bad cards every expansion..

    0
  • PopeNeia's Avatar 205 172 Posts Joined 07/06/2019
    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago

    FYI every time you Invoke Galakrond, you summon 2 1/1 imps. So this card is basically Landscaping, but with the chance of buffing your ither minions as well.

    This ain't no place for a hero

    1
  • DoubleSummon's Avatar 455 636 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago
    Quote From PopeNeia

    FYI every time you Invoke Galakrond, you summon 2 1/1 imps. So this card is basically Landscaping, but with the chance of buffing your ither minions as well.

    so you summon a 2/1s with this card, right? then it's fine if it hits other minions as well it's not really bad.. also it might pair with other imp based cards we saw before.. the warlock theme seem to be swarming imps on board.

    0
  • RandomGuy's Avatar 305 474 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago

    This card is actually pretty fine. Not good, but possibly good enough because Warlock needs something to do.

    0
  • Joda's Avatar Magma Rager 240 143 Posts Joined 04/01/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    Meh on its own, but if you already have a board, it can be a good tempo play.

    Never netdeck, craft Whizbang instead!

    0
  • ArcanisDF's Avatar Bronze Supporter 285 179 Posts Joined 08/01/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    another really weak invoke cards for warlock... why blizz? why??

    0
  • ArngrimUndying's Avatar Jaina 355 341 Posts Joined 06/11/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    Not great, but decent enough for an Invoke card in a "Galakrond Zoolock" deck. But unfortunately doesn't look like Galakrond really fits the Zoolock archetype so not sure how much this will actually see play.

    0
  • mayhern's Avatar 130 142 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    Interesting spell, especially because of the invoke power! The question is if it activates before or after the imps are summoned.

    0
  • UVE's Avatar Uther 230 97 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago
    Quote From mayhern

    Interesting spell, especially because of the invoke power! The question is if it activates before or after the imps are summoned.

    I think that summon after invoke.

    Zoolock will be a thing for sure.

    By The Holy Light!

    0
  • xreflex98's Avatar Bulbasaur 95 94 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    Looks kinda lame but might work well enough in Zoolock.

    0
  • Orrien's Avatar 190 37 Posts Joined 03/15/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago
    Quote From UVE
    Quote From mayhern

    Interesting spell, especially because of the invoke power! The question is if it activates before or after the imps are summoned.

    I think that summon after invoke.

    Zoolock will be a thing for sure.

    Firstly imps are summoned, then the buff happens. Decent card for zoolock, although I doubt it'll see much play (especially that warlock's galakrond is pretty bad)

    0
  • IlBelTia's Avatar Wizard 180 197 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    Don't like It very much, but I suppose will be unswappable in Galakron Warlocks. 

    0
  • linkblade91's Avatar Global Moderator Draconically Dedicated 260 323 Posts Joined 02/09/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    An auto-include in Galalock, but how good is that deck, really? At the moment I just don't see it. Goes well with Darkshire Councilman, at least.


    If you have the time please check out my custom expansion, The Trials Within Us!

    0
  • johnyDI's Avatar Island 165 147 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

    As I said in all my galakrond related card reviews, this package is a sleeper. It might not see play right away, but as soon as rotation hits, every one is going to hate this card. 

    It also reminds me of power of the wild when you play it after quest completion. And this one doesn't need you to complete the quest.

    1
  • Nere's Avatar 90 67 Posts Joined 07/28/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    I´m not very impressed. While I like the fully invoked Warlock card that draws 3, the invoking cards in Lock are really underwhelming. 

    0
  • Valord's Avatar 150 145 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    Just seems like a win more card but with not that more payoff.

    0
  • DelkoHS's Avatar Child of Galakrond 280 284 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    Similarly to Dragonblight Cultist this might be staple in Zoo decks, which is what their Galakrond seems to aim towards. But on its own, it doesn't seem too powerful. Wait and see I guess.

    0
  • Input's Avatar 160 163 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    Invoke first makes this minimally a 3 mana for two 2/1's and +1/0 to other minions. I think it will see play, just not sure how strong this zoo-Galakrond-lock will be.

    0
  • Hedwyn's Avatar Draconically Dedicated 290 160 Posts Joined 07/05/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    Possible only will work in zoo invoke decks, but it's still not so strong, but at least have a good sinergy with the Galakrond hero power.

    I'm sorry for my bad english :)

    0
  • Almaniarra's Avatar Draconically Dedicated 410 698 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    I don't want more imps Blizzard. I want Dragonlock.

    better you show some dragon related cards for warlocks. We need creative stuff. Not little green imps.

    0
  • frosthearth's Avatar 300 264 Posts Joined 03/18/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    I think this one won't make the cut. I hope there are some neutral invoke cards which summon tokens. 3 mana is too much.

     
    0
  • TheOdinson's Avatar 140 144 Posts Joined 06/04/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    This card is a way bigger bummer than the other Invoke card. It does buff the two tokens, but its not like they have Charge or even Rush. They are just 2/1 for 3 mana. Buffing your other guys is interesting but the value of buffing 6-7 attack minions means the other side of the card, the invoke, is negated. And +1 attack on 1-3 minions plus a couple 2/1s isn't that exciting. The card will probably be played, and it will be fine, but its definitely not a game breaker.

    To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of the women.

    0
  • YourPrivateNightmare's Avatar Swamp 525 898 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 3 weeks, 2 days ago

    the only thing fiendish about this is the mana cost. 1/1s aren't that powerful, almost every class has access to some sort of 1-damage AoE

    I tried having fun once.

    It was awful.

    0
  • Leave a Comment

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.