If it feels like this meta might be a little weird you'd be right.
What we're seeing across the board is that except for the top 3 decks those being pirate aggro, turbo thralls, and sivir
Every deck is roughly equal in terms of winrate at 52% suggesting it doesnt really matter what you play.
Swim got to diamond with Poros and lists it as an A tier deck, is it actually no...but again it doesn't really matter what he chose to play outside of that narrow margin of top decks.
How do I feel about this? The competitive deck brewer in me is frustrated by the fact that the only way to get a leg up is to play lists that essentially don't make sense.
But the casual player in me is happy that you can essentially play whatever the hell you want and have the same chance of winning as long as you aren't rolling S tier deck lists.
From a pure static point of view the meta does look healthy :
The sentiment that I get from most player is that this meta is significant improvement over the last ones, that no achievement given how bad the last ones were but progress is always welcome.
See a lot of variety in deck types in silver. When Echo gets two chornobreaks off in one round it sure feels like bullshit but it doesn’t happen every time I see him. Feels so much better than playing Az / Ire every other game even though I made it to platinum last season playing against Az / Ire every game is boring AF
I would say it is an improvement for sure. It just feels weird hard to put my finger on it.
I gave the poros example on purpose, and we can lump yetis in.
Like how is this as good as a highly synergistic list built around champions.
Probably because high deck building.costs, card sequencing, and predictability is bad right now vs just playing weird beef from hand.
You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.