so you either get a slightly worse Darkbomb, or a free 3 damage attack which your opponent can play around. Do you prefer this or Xal’atath?
To clarify on how Xal’atath works: it’s NOT random. It’ll have the targetable spells glow in a purple aura, and you don’t get to drag the spell to a target (just like non-target spells). When you play it, the HS singleplayer AI will choose the target they think is best, and the spell will target that minion.
Some people said Spell Damage doesn’t really benefit Priest a lot, so how about this?
If I continue feedback I’ll finish the previous page in my past post then continue here
Feedback (feel free to contest if you think it’s wrong):
Show Spoiler
Nirast
Show Spoiler
TH — -1 star for aesthetics (losing, not loosing. Also, the whole effect really should be written as something like “after you attack, destroy a friendly Treant to not lose Durability”), so 4/5
SotL — -1(?) star for idea (feels a little forced to have the first effect jammed in as an incentive to attack), so 4(5?)/5
WC — -1 star for aesthetics (weapon, not Weapon. And doesn’t really have any business being a Warrior card), so 4/5
DC — -1 star for idea (Battlecry effect feels unnecessary, second effect is just “if you attacked a minion), -1 star for balance (probably busted in any dragon deck, even non dragon decks thanks to the battlecry), -1 star for aesthetics (Discover, not Driscover), so 2/5
SoO — -1 star for aesthetics (text is cramped, effect has nothing to do with flavor), -1 star for idea (The effect seems to not really achieve anything), -1 for balance (5 Mana for random minions), so 2/5
SC — -1 star for balance (for hunter it’s strictly worse than 3 Mana deal 4 damage, which is pretty meh already for hunter), -1 star for aesthetics (really shouldn’t be a hunter card) so /5
linkblade91
Show Spoiler
Xal (Version 2 is better) — 5/5 [totally not biased [Xal’atath bros :^) [but seriously, nice]]]
EDIT: I think the dual class one is too good with warlocks array of self damage, so 4/5 on that on
Demonxz95
Show Spoiler
EL — -2 stars for critical fail on balance (you can never equip another weapon again, any weapon buff lasts only 1 attack if it doesn’t give Durability, 1-damage attacks isn’t worth it), so 3/5
WF — -1 star for aesthetics (I really like the fact you wanted to do different arts for the stages, but just changing the shade feels bad. Also, those are very clearly NOT worsen fangs), -1 star for idea (just a bit too boring for my taste), so 3/
Wailor
Show Spoiler
MM (1st one) — -1 star for aesthetics (don’t really see it being a priest card, better to make it Paladin only and MDF watermark), so 4/5
Pokeniner
Show Spoiler
PB — -1 star for aesthetics (hero, not Hero), -1 star for balance (2 is too expensive considering you keep replaying this, I’d say 1) so /5
Hordaki
Show Spoiler
SC — 5/5
BloodMefist
Show Spoiler
IH — 5/5
Xal — -1 star for aesthetics (that a WoW screenshot?), -1 star for balance (I think the non-corrupted version of this is too good at generating value, just the Corrupt effect would be interesting), so 3/5
anchorm4n
Show Spoiler
BB — -1 star for aesthetics (I agree, Art needs changing), -2 star for critical fail on idea (just Gorehowl effect if you think about it), so 3/5
SoS(V1) — -1 star for aesthetics (it’s REALLY wordy), -1 star for idea (bit too complex for my taste), so 3/5
SoS(V2) — -2 stars for critical fail on balance (that’s a loooooot of gas which you can use right when your turn starts), so 3/5
Saving my progress so one accident doesn’t erase everything, I’m still writing
Also, about your feedback @anchor4n: it shows a purple aura around your targeting spells, you now play them as non target spells and the A.I. targets whoever it would on a single player match. Would it be better to just straight up write “Hearthstone AI”? I feel like it would detract from the flavor a little bit, but idk
Doing a Rager because that’s what this comp is really about (probably too cheap). Yes, the effect counts Mytim'orfn itself. Yes, it’s pronounced how you think it is.
EDIT: Actually, never mind, it doesn’t count itself. I’ll write “all other Elementals” in the final version
Doing only spells since I feel like that’s the focus with both the old gods
Feedback (feel free to contest it if you think it’s wrong):
Wailor
Show Spoiler
ES — -1 star for aesthetics (not really related to MDF), so 4/5
MW — -1 star for aesthetics (the “discard” on the second clause should be capitalized), so 4/5
linkblade91
Show Spoiler
TYS — -1 star for aesthetics (the difference in art styles is a real eyesore for me), so 4/5
fungusABao
Show Spoiler
TF — -1 star for aesthetics (not MDF related, should be a space between the ‘:’ of the Overload and the number), so 4/5 stars
DavnanKillder
Show Spoiler
LB — -2 stars for critical fail in aesthetics (non-HS art, many formatting errors), -1 star for idea (too many tokens with wildly different effects), so 2/5
shaveyou
Show Spoiler
PB — -1 star for aesthetics (not related to MDF), so 4/5
grumpymonk
Show Spoiler
AS — -1(?) star for balance (I think it’s too strong in burn mage, could be wrong though), so 4(5?)/5
FS — -2 stars for critical fail in idea (technically it’s allowed, but doesn’t actually benefit either of the old god cards), -1 star for balance (think of it as draw a huge cheap Murloc and burn a dragon in your deck, which isn’t that big of a downside), so 2/5
HotW — -1 star for aesthetics (don’t really see a connection between the name/theme and the actual effect), so 4/5
Demonxz95
Show Spoiler
CsoC — 5/5
F — -2 stars for critical fail in idea (technically it’s allowed, but doesn’t actually benefit either of the old god cards), -1 star for aesthetics (not really related to MDF), so 2/5
@anchorm4n don’t actually stop lol, I want to earn my way back rightfully (also, someone actually read my bio FeelsGoodMan)
about the leaderboard, it looks fine on my end, but I’m on mobile so it might be different. Can you guys tell the mods what’s actually wrong so they can fix it? Thanks
@Live4vrRdieTryin you are in the leaderboard though. Is this because of the broken thing again?
Controversial Comment
How about this one?
so you either get a slightly worse Darkbomb, or a free 3 damage attack which your opponent can play around. Do you prefer this or Xal’atath?
To clarify on how Xal’atath works: it’s NOT random. It’ll have the targetable spells glow in a purple aura, and you don’t get to drag the spell to a target (just like non-target spells). When you play it, the HS singleplayer AI will choose the target they think is best, and the spell will target that minion.
Some people said Spell Damage doesn’t really benefit Priest a lot, so how about this?
If I continue feedback I’ll finish the previous page in my past post then continue here
Feedback (feel free to contest if you think it’s wrong):
Nirast
TH — -1 star for aesthetics (losing, not loosing. Also, the whole effect really should be written as something like “after you attack, destroy a friendly Treant to not lose Durability”), so 4/5
SotL — -1(?) star for idea (feels a little forced to have the first effect jammed in as an incentive to attack), so 4(5?)/5
WC — -1 star for aesthetics (weapon, not Weapon. And doesn’t really have any business being a Warrior card), so 4/5
DC — -1 star for idea (Battlecry effect feels unnecessary, second effect is just “if you attacked a minion), -1 star for balance (probably busted in any dragon deck, even non dragon decks thanks to the battlecry), -1 star for aesthetics (Discover, not Driscover), so 2/5
SoO — -1 star for aesthetics (text is cramped, effect has nothing to do with flavor), -1 star for idea (The effect seems to not really achieve anything), -1 for balance (5 Mana for random minions), so 2/5
SC — -1 star for balance (for hunter it’s strictly worse than 3 Mana deal 4 damage, which is pretty meh already for hunter), -1 star for aesthetics (really shouldn’t be a hunter card) so /5
linkblade91
Xal (Version 2 is better) — 5/5 [totally not biased [Xal’atath bros :^) [but seriously, nice]]]
EDIT: I think the dual class one is too good with warlocks array of self damage, so 4/5 on that on
Demonxz95
EL — -2 stars for critical fail on balance (you can never equip another weapon again, any weapon buff lasts only 1 attack if it doesn’t give Durability, 1-damage attacks isn’t worth it), so 3/5
WF — -1 star for aesthetics (I really like the fact you wanted to do different arts for the stages, but just changing the shade feels bad. Also, those are very clearly NOT worsen fangs), -1 star for idea (just a bit too boring for my taste), so 3/
Wailor
MM (1st one) — -1 star for aesthetics (don’t really see it being a priest card, better to make it Paladin only and MDF watermark), so 4/5
Pokeniner
PB — -1 star for aesthetics (hero, not Hero), -1 star for balance (2 is too expensive considering you keep replaying this, I’d say 1) so /5
Hordaki
SC — 5/5
BloodMefist
IH — 5/5
Xal — -1 star for aesthetics (that a WoW screenshot?), -1 star for balance (I think the non-corrupted version of this is too good at generating value, just the Corrupt effect would be interesting), so 3/5
anchorm4n
BB — -1 star for aesthetics (I agree, Art needs changing), -2 star for critical fail on idea (just Gorehowl effect if you think about it), so 3/5
SoS(V1) — -1 star for aesthetics (it’s REALLY wordy), -1 star for idea (bit too complex for my taste), so 3/5
SoS(V2) — -2 stars for critical fail on balance (that’s a loooooot of gas which you can use right when your turn starts), so 3/5
Saving my progress so one accident doesn’t erase everything, I’m still writing
Also, about your feedback @anchor4n: it shows a purple aura around your targeting spells, you now play them as non target spells and the A.I. targets whoever it would on a single player match. Would it be better to just straight up write “Hearthstone AI”? I feel like it would detract from the flavor a little bit, but idk
First idea: something that has nothing to do with the Durability, just to be quirky
(Xal’atath chooses = HS A.I.)
Feedback later hopefully
Yay, finalist at last! Good luck everyone
BTW, since I don’t think anyone answered when I last asked, are people still doing the “rate 5 for one”/“rate 1 for rest” thing?
Transfer Student?
@ChickyChick Probably the theme... it’s too general
Doing a Rager because that’s what this comp is really about (probably too cheap). Yes, the effect counts Mytim'orfn itself. Yes, it’s pronounced how you think it is.
EDIT: Actually, never mind, it doesn’t count itself. I’ll write “all other Elementals” in the final version
Feedback later
So are people still doing that thing where they vote 1 star on all non-favorites and 5 stars on the favorite?
Because I received a small amount of negative feedback and I’m a perfectionist, I did this. Which one should I submit?
@Wailor I meant it should be capitalized because every second clause in Choose One cards starts with a capitalized word (see Rising Winds)
Doing only spells since I feel like that’s the focus with both the old gods
Feedback (feel free to contest it if you think it’s wrong):
Wailor
ES — -1 star for aesthetics (not really related to MDF), so 4/5
MW — -1 star for aesthetics (the “discard” on the second clause should be capitalized), so 4/5
linkblade91
TYS — -1 star for aesthetics (the difference in art styles is a real eyesore for me), so 4/5
fungusABao
TF — -1 star for aesthetics (not MDF related, should be a space between the ‘:’ of the Overload and the number), so 4/5 stars
DavnanKillder
LB — -2 stars for critical fail in aesthetics (non-HS art, many formatting errors), -1 star for idea (too many tokens with wildly different effects), so 2/5
shaveyou
PB — -1 star for aesthetics (not related to MDF), so 4/5
grumpymonk
AS — -1(?) star for balance (I think it’s too strong in burn mage, could be wrong though), so 4(5?)/5
FS — -2 stars for critical fail in idea (technically it’s allowed, but doesn’t actually benefit either of the old god cards), -1 star for balance (think of it as draw a huge cheap Murloc and burn a dragon in your deck, which isn’t that big of a downside), so 2/5
HotW — -1 star for aesthetics (don’t really see a connection between the name/theme and the actual effect), so 4/5
Demonxz95
CsoC — 5/5
F — -2 stars for critical fail in idea (technically it’s allowed, but doesn’t actually benefit either of the old god cards), -1 star for aesthetics (not really related to MDF), so 2/5
Hmmmm... Darkest Hour?
Prince Malchezaar?
EDIT: actually, no legendaries. Is it the felhunter token?
N'Zoth, God of the Deep?
Awesome, thanks to sinti and anchorm4n!
Do the first two lines actually give a hint or are they just filler?
And uhh, [Hearthstone Card (Doctor Morrigan) Not Found]?
@anchorm4n don’t actually stop lol, I want to earn my way back rightfully (also, someone actually read my bio FeelsGoodMan)
about the leaderboard, it looks fine on my end, but I’m on mobile so it might be different. Can you guys tell the mods what’s actually wrong so they can fix it? Thanks
@Live4vrRdieTryin you are in the leaderboard though. Is this because of the broken thing again?
Zola the Gorgon then? And the leaderboard is in this thread’s OP