I was definitely happy to see this in patch notes. It makes the archetype a lot more consistent and also make synergy with Underbelly Fence way better too. I wouldn't complain if they changed all the previous ones as well, but i know they said they wouldn't. Of course they're completely changing names and art of cards now so who knows!
I would like to ask you to delete my old accounts with usernames Wendeee and Wende. When that is done, I would like to ask you to rename my main WendeCZ username to Wendeee. It would be also great to update the "joined" date on the main account to "03/29/2019" (according to old Wendeee account - yes I am proud that i joined during the hearthstation:)
Thank you very much!
Not going to delete anything just yet, but i did go ahead and fix your name and join date =D
Looks like things got a bit de-railed here. I don't believe there's any reason this discussion had to escalate as it did, and i think both sides unintentionally instigated the other a bit. Let's try to keep discussions civil and respectful rather than taking jabs at each other due to something minor that may have annoyed you. Everyone has their right to form their own opinions and express them, but there's no need for insults or passive belittling of any sort. I think we're better than that!
The subject of this thread definitely has some merit for discussion, however i will lock this particular thread rather than dismantle it. You are more than welcome to discuss your ideas further in a new thread, however we do ask that we maintain a reasonable level of civility in responses from everyone and keep the stones on the ground.
Not a particular list but Rez Priest of any sort is probably my favourite sort of archetype, and when RoS released you can guess what card i immediately crafted and played with
I've dealt with that account. It's definitely an important feature for the site with high priority. At the moment there's some other key features that would be a bit more valuable, but if spam such as this begins to be an issue a solution will be devised. Thanks for letting us know about this spam! Will definitely be on the lookout for more.
I think there could be room to compromise between both implementations.
It could remain as it is now, but with the addition of allowing the user to still edit the guide on the same page as the deck builder as well as separately after it is created.
I think there should still be an option to edit the guide separately because it is unnecessary to load the deck builder in that case, especially on mobile.
Heh, sometimes mech warriors just assume their Dyn-o-matic will do work and play it. I love when they do that in an attempt to clear a Nightmare Amalgam on my board and then i watch them hover over it after it does nothing. Jebaited.
Awesome flavour from some classic lore and i do enjoy resurrect mechanics. This is a hell of a card, and just when i finally thought i had all the classic set.
Unlike the last cards they added to classic these ones are actually intriguing, mostly. Pretty cool to see so many new cards outside of an expansion. Sad i wont be able to do any mind blast OTK decks in standard now but it's for the best i suppose. New cards are being added to the site as i type this =D.
Did the forum navigation change on mobile? At the top of the screen it used to show each subgroup but now only shows the current one. In other words, it would show Forums > Site Support > Thread Name. Now it only shows the name, and I can only go up one level at a time. It makes forum navigation even more difficult on mobile, since the top-right drop down doesn’t fit onthe screen.
Yes those are called breadcrumbs and they were modified because they can't be formatted very well in a mobile layout.
Quote From Fluxflashor
Breadcrumbs are less derp on mobile. They now act as a "back" button.
It only works for cardimg currently, will work for regular tooltips soon!
I was definitely happy to see this in patch notes. It makes the archetype a lot more consistent and also make synergy with Underbelly Fence way better too. I wouldn't complain if they changed all the previous ones as well, but i know they said they wouldn't. Of course they're completely changing names and art of cards now so who knows!
Looks like it will be returning, as it was datamined.
Not going to delete anything just yet, but i did go ahead and fix your name and join date =D
Looks like things got a bit de-railed here. I don't believe there's any reason this discussion had to escalate as it did, and i think both sides unintentionally instigated the other a bit. Let's try to keep discussions civil and respectful rather than taking jabs at each other due to something minor that may have annoyed you. Everyone has their right to form their own opinions and express them, but there's no need for insults or passive belittling of any sort. I think we're better than that!
The subject of this thread definitely has some merit for discussion, however i will lock this particular thread rather than dismantle it. You are more than welcome to discuss your ideas further in a new thread, however we do ask that we maintain a reasonable level of civility in responses from everyone and keep the stones on the ground.
Thanks =D
Not a particular list but Rez Priest of any sort is probably my favourite sort of archetype, and when RoS released you can guess what card i immediately crafted and played with
Care to dance with death?
I've dealt with that account. It's definitely an important feature for the site with high priority. At the moment there's some other key features that would be a bit more valuable, but if spam such as this begins to be an issue a solution will be devised. Thanks for letting us know about this spam! Will definitely be on the lookout for more.
I think there could be room to compromise between both implementations.
It could remain as it is now, but with the addition of allowing the user to still edit the guide on the same page as the deck builder as well as separately after it is created.
I think there should still be an option to edit the guide separately because it is unnecessary to load the deck builder in that case, especially on mobile.
Heh, sometimes mech warriors just assume their Dyn-o-matic will do work and play it. I love when they do that in an attempt to clear a Nightmare Amalgam on my board and then i watch them hover over it after it does nothing. Jebaited.
Good read :)
Mike Donais said this would be the best one & his favourite. I can see the evidence is poking us now!
Good luck Boozor!
Thanks, I'll edit in Violet Hold for Erekem. Curious if anyone else can recall encountering Sael'orn outside of that chapter
This looks real balanced TBH. A welcome addition to Warlock.
Awesome flavour from some classic lore and i do enjoy resurrect mechanics. This is a hell of a card, and just when i finally thought i had all the classic set.
I am happy to see Brightwing finally make it to Hearthstone. Definitely random but also a dragon. I feel like we will see this around a lot.
Unlike the last cards they added to classic these ones are actually intriguing, mostly. Pretty cool to see so many new cards outside of an expansion. Sad i wont be able to do any mind blast OTK decks in standard now but it's for the best i suppose. New cards are being added to the site as i type this =D.
Get building!
Yes those are called breadcrumbs and they were modified because they can't be formatted very well in a mobile layout.
The menu definitely could be optimized still.
It's definitely possible! I can't say exactly when it will happen but we definitely should have this. Made a note of it.
You can be sure as soon as the support is there i will be obsessively associating everything with related assets 🙃