Let's try again. This one is more a midrange minion for Warrior that may delay kills, but it occupies enemy board space for periods of time. Note that it won't take damage when making an enemy Dormant.
This is still a downside. I would give him extra stats.
This is a strictly better king krush, even with 8 cost cards in your deck. And if you don't have 8 cost cards in your deck (not a hard requirement for hunter), this destroys a minion and gains a stat boost as well. I don't know how you could fix this card, as it basically has no requirement in most hunter decks.
I've got an idea but I'm not sure in which direction to take it. Here are my two first alternatives of the same flavor. TRIGGER WARNING: One is an iteration of Deck of Lunacy. The other is obviously inspired by Renounce Darkness but I think that card is associated with less PTSD. Yeah, in a way they are basically rip-offs, but I like the flavor and maybe it could work anyway?
The wording is chosen to affect spells in both your hand and deck.
Feedback appreciated: Which one is better? Frozen throne watermark OK? Balanced for its cost/rarity? Are they too unoriginal?
I think the first one could use a buff - Deck of Lunacy was so strong because it affected your entire deck, and was in a class that could abuse a deck full of those spells. This one targets less spells, in a class with less ways to abuse the high level spells, with a smaller buff than Deck of Lunacy. I think having it replace holy spells with ones that cost 3 more would be better.
Good luck to all finalists! Only 7 this time - were there really that few entries this week not to allow an eighth?
It's an interesting challenge, but all but four of the classes were removed from the competition, leaving those who aren't experienced with those classes in the dust.
No, it'll also be in constructed as said in the post. That being said, quillboars won't have any direct synergies in constructed, only being useful in menagerie decks.
You could argue the same things above tavern brawls, and no one is complaining about that. Also, considering you can reroll legendary quests, worst case scenario you get an extra quest on that day.
Honestly, I think this should be treated like a small event ingame. On the 15th of every month, give everyone a legendary quest that asks you to play a game with with Nozdormu in your deck. Variations upon this idea are forcing Nozdormu players into games with one another on that day, and having the quest require your opponent to have Noz in their deck as well.
Unfortunately that body is also a downside - minion removal is much more common than weapon removal.
Unity. Precision. Perfection.
Is Auctionmaster Beardo + Uther of the Ebon Blade combo finally viable? No. Will I play it? Yes.
This is still a downside. I would give him extra stats.
I think a mix of both is best, but you are completely right we're missing fun skins.
Drain Soul is happy again.
Is there no hero skin bundle this time?
This is a strictly better king krush, even with 8 cost cards in your deck. And if you don't have 8 cost cards in your deck (not a hard requirement for hunter), this destroys a minion and gains a stat boost as well. I don't know how you could fix this card, as it basically has no requirement in most hunter decks.
This is a pretty big change, and I think Bilzz would announce it a long time in advance.
I have the feeling that "pilgrim" actually translates better to "adventurer", considering the raid theme going on here.
I think the first one could use a buff - Deck of Lunacy was so strong because it affected your entire deck, and was in a class that could abuse a deck full of those spells. This one targets less spells, in a class with less ways to abuse the high level spells, with a smaller buff than Deck of Lunacy. I think having it replace holy spells with ones that cost 3 more would be better.
Here's something I threw together - what do you guys think? The card is worded this way in order to work with druid's ramp theme.
I have a question - would dual class cards be allowed for these kinds of competitions? What restrictions would be on them?
It's an interesting challenge, but all but four of the classes were removed from the competition, leaving those who aren't experienced with those classes in the dust.
This card is still a work in progress - feedback is appreciated! This is inspired by Wrathspike Brute.
Edit - will probably change the card text to say "after", instead of whenever.
No, it'll also be in constructed as said in the post. That being said, quillboars won't have any direct synergies in constructed, only being useful in menagerie decks.
You could argue the same things above tavern brawls, and no one is complaining about that. Also, considering you can reroll legendary quests, worst case scenario you get an extra quest on that day.
Honestly, I think this should be treated like a small event ingame. On the 15th of every month, give everyone a legendary quest that asks you to play a game with with Nozdormu in your deck. Variations upon this idea are forcing Nozdormu players into games with one another on that day, and having the quest require your opponent to have Noz in their deck as well.
Firemancer Flurgl + Toxfin + Lightning Bloom
Why does this cost so much? This is the same cost as Medivh, which was a skin + card back.