2 mana draw a card is really bad, 2 mana draw 2 cards is fine.. but not spectacular.. also if the cards cost the same you lose(?) if not it has more of a chance to see play.
maybe if almost your whole deck is 2 cost cards (we saw 3 2 cost druid cards so far..)
I think joust was made to win on a tie a few patches ago.
great have that kind of druid go rampant.. why not.. they really just give so many spell synergy while shaman for example is a mess of different directions every expansion and then they wonder why druid is strong all the time..
Not impactful enough, current soul DH builds won't use such a card, this seems like a good card with spell damage.. otherwise.. not needed in the intended deck..
maybe in a new deck.. will need to see what's the direction of DH this set.
You throw something (deal 4 damage), and then the person in it splashes (the AoE). This card could be very powerful, although it's not that strong without Corrupting it, so I'm not too sure about it. By the time you're able to Corrupt it, 2 damage might no longer be enough to kill what you wanted with it.
That said, 4 mana for a Fireball and a Consecration is good at pretty much any point, so I reckon it'll see some play. If there was an option for half-stars, I'd rate it a 3.5.
Jade Lightning was played a lot for burst, having direct dmg spells in shaman is different from having them in mage.. sure the 1/1,2/2, 3/3 probably made the card better but the burst with spell damage shaman has easy access to.. is relevant.
after corruption this is a better Swipe, specially cause you have spell dmg totem.
@TheTriferianGeneral You are wrong on the first line of your comment I don't see how the dragons of LoR compare to the dragons in HS except 2 cards having "behold a dragon" which is different from holding it as well since it counts dragons on board. that being said I am not the one who down voted you this thread and you don't need to be angry about people disagreeing with you.. I assure you it's not malice for most people who downvote comments they think are wrong.
What i meant that all dragon themed cards that i saw have a hs tribal vibe (not dragons in particular) they all follow the formula "put 20 cards of that tribe into your deck and you will benefit". This in my oppinion is neither encouraging interesting deck building nor interesting gameplay. You still can like and play it, but i don't like it and won't play it myself.
I wouldn't call that a hearthstone design.. yugioh did that back at 2002.. iin GX at least the GBA game you had pure element deck from all 6.. I know cause played that game a lot..
still recall dragon warrior from Whispers of the old gods having 6 dragons and I think only the charger as synergy? in the refined state so.. it's not really "throw all cards of that type and call it a day" even in HS and in early YGO they actually did just that for deck archtypes..
IDK how it's in magic.. but maybe it's also like that..
You don't have to run all dragons, also you don't have to go Demacia/Taragon..
Same way spider decks currently are SI/Freljord. (they who endure)
it's much much easier to behold a dragon than plunder, seems like a good finisher for dragon decks have synergy with fury, rally is such a strong mechanic.
But the dragon deck as it seems is quite heavy on mid tier units 4-6 mana.. maybe you would prefer Relentless Pursuit instead?
I like this card it's flexible and glues together a lot of dragons with the cheating ability (just said in the 9 cost dragon.. "only if you could cheat this out.").
If this card costed 8 and had support it would have all the call of the mountain themes together.
Finally a managerie end game card.. I like this.. it's even more interesting than the old gods N'zoth..
4 mana 2/2 is a tempo suicide... it "draws" 2 cards though..
This card depends on which combos we will see with those eclipse cards.
More 0 cost cards stuff.. really blizzard? don't you EVER learn?
They said that 0 cost cards mean big deck restrictions..they lied.
2 mana draw a card is really bad, 2 mana draw 2 cards is fine.. but not spectacular.. also if the cards cost the same you lose(?) if not it has more of a chance to see play.
maybe if almost your whole deck is 2 cost cards (we saw 3 2 cost druid cards so far..)
I think joust was made to win on a tie a few patches ago.
Everyone who have seen re:zero season 2 is terrified of this card..
Well we can play with it currently so which decks can actually use this guy?
If there's some SHR synergy this might be really impactful, will see if paladin gets another SHR card this expansion.
8 mana: Kael'thas Sunstrider + Lightning Bloom + Solar Eclipse + Survival of the Fittest.. good luck dealing with that.
great have that kind of druid go rampant.. why not.. they really just give so many spell synergy while shaman for example is a mess of different directions every expansion and then they wonder why druid is strong all the time..
Can't be totally dissmissed yet cause of Y'sheraj.
it's neutral so.. nothing too spectacular yet.
All parts seem a bit under powered but c'thun itself is just a really strong finisher for control decks.
Not impactful enough, current soul DH builds won't use such a card, this seems like a good card with spell damage.. otherwise.. not needed in the intended deck..
maybe in a new deck.. will need to see what's the direction of DH this set.
If you are running highlander or a control deck this can be a good card..
we need to take notice of different tags of minions for N'zoth.
Jade Lightning was played a lot for burst, having direct dmg spells in shaman is different from having them in mage.. sure the 1/1,2/2, 3/3 probably made the card better but the burst with spell damage shaman has easy access to.. is relevant.
after corruption this is a better Swipe, specially cause you have spell dmg totem.
played one game and watched some streams.. the elementals seem busted.. specially lil rag..
too many elementals give permanent buffs..
also the game mode have some insane lag a strategy game shouldn't be too much of an apm check.. specially when it's supposed to be more casual..
So what they gonna do to make it rain? 3 mana? 2 targets?
Can't hit nexus?
We need a chart of emotte/win rate we need to see the meta!
jk, of course sad poro has low win rate :( people use him when they lose..
I wouldn't call that a hearthstone design.. yugioh did that back at 2002.. iin GX at least the GBA game you had pure element deck from all 6.. I know cause played that game a lot..
still recall dragon warrior from Whispers of the old gods having 6 dragons and I think only the charger as synergy? in the refined state so.. it's not really "throw all cards of that type and call it a day" even in HS and in early YGO they actually did just that for deck archtypes..
IDK how it's in magic.. but maybe it's also like that..
You don't have to run all dragons, also you don't have to go Demacia/Taragon..
Same way spider decks currently are SI/Freljord. (they who endure)
it's much much easier to behold a dragon than plunder, seems like a good finisher for dragon decks have synergy with fury, rally is such a strong mechanic.
But the dragon deck as it seems is quite heavy on mid tier units 4-6 mana.. maybe you would prefer Relentless Pursuit instead?
I like this card it's flexible and glues together a lot of dragons with the cheating ability (just said in the 9 cost dragon.. "only if you could cheat this out.").
If this card costed 8 and had support it would have all the call of the mountain themes together.