I like the effect, it's pretty original and goes around a pretty frustrating mechanic. People are probably right about it being too expensive, though.

Besides this, I have some questions regarding to how this card interacts with other draw effects (and just with drawing at the beginning of the turn. Imagine you have 5 cards in your hand and use this. This would draw 5 cards and "remember" you still need to draw 3 more cards.

• Now, at the beginning of your next turn, you draw one card. What would happen? Would the card draw simply not occur or would it be added to the remembered pending draws (adding to a total of 4).
• Finally, when you draw all the "remembered" cards… Does the "cannot overdraw" effect still apply?

I wonder if this would work better as an Un'goro card, as the effect is pretty much Adapt (although the options are slightly different and the effects gained are completely random). Druid already has Living Mana in that expansion, so I don't know.

Besides that, would the Coral Treants also be Beasts? It's a bit lame, but corals are technically animals so 🤷🏼‍♂️

Hands down the best idea so far, could easily win the comp. It has some things to polish, though.

• The white background is quite ugly, and the creature depicted, while cool, looks like a Totem more than like an Elemental. So, I suggest finding a regular fire elemental.
• The wording should say "stores" instead of "store".
• Maybe it has too much face potential with Fire AoE, especially with stuff that also hits the Guzzler itself (not sure if it exists right now). I don't know, I'd probably change it to target enemy minions only, but that might be too weak.

The stats are definitely very strong for a 4 mana weapon, so I'd make the change AeroJulwin proposed.

Besides this, I'm not sure if the effect is a bit too simple for a legendary weapon, given it's basically a weaker version of Lifesteal. Maybe the fat stats make it such a strong control tool that the legendary status is warranted, I don't know.

An improvement over the previous version. About the targeted spell not fitting the text, I think it would because adding that would allow you to drop the "(if possible)" part of the text. I know you still want it to cast any spell, but just to let you know.

Pretty cool and flexible card. Not much to add, sorry.

Probably my new favorite card, but linkblade is right about the cost.

The wording is much better now, but I'm still not a huge fan of the effect. Other people seem to really enjoy it, so I encourage you to go with it nevertheless.

I agree with MrRhapsody and linkblade that it should search for targeted spells only, and it'd still probably need a Cost increase. I mean, even if you pull something reasonable like Blessing of Kings, you're still summoning a 6/5 that thins your deck for 4 Mana. Not super crazy, but that's far from the high end of this card.

Besides that, I'd probably use a Dragon-related watermark (either an existing one or not, like the one I used for Infinite Whelp), as, if this card existed outside a Dragon-themed expansion, the token would definetly be a Silver Hand Recruit. I know it sounds very minor, but for me, it would make the card way more believable.

I don't know if I like how it synergizes with such an abstract mechanic, to be honest. Also, as it is right now, it seems like it also makes Deathrattles trigger twice, which would be quite OP for a vanilla 2 Cost minion.

I am alone in this, but I prefer the buff version, as the transform one can backfire if you have beefy Whelps.

However, if you end up going with the transform version, I agree with other people that it should also be a Paladin card, as both Bronze Dragons and Divine Shield are pretty much Paladin things.

I'm not a fan of Lord Nefarius, but the other two cards are my favorite so far. You're having a very good season, to be honest.

Single Broodmother is probably my favorite of the two, as her effect is very creative and the name very funny. linkblade is probably right about the watermark, so maybe she should use the Onyxia's Lair one.

Onyxia, Mother of Corruption is also very cool, as the Corrupt effect is a very natural upgrade, and the fact you can only Corrupt her by playing 10-Cost minions makes her balanced. If you end up going with her, I suggest using the current artwork for the Corrupted version. For the base form, you could probably use her undead self, as none of her three existing iterations have used it.

I like your card, specially the name, but I think it should only target minions if it doesn't make the text too small.

I didn't think of the connection between gladiator and multi-type, but now that you explained it, makes sense. However, as it's not very obvious, you could double down and rename the card as Gladiator of N'zoth, which would also fit the artwork pretty well IMO.

I also like the change of not having an initial 1 damage.

I prefer the new statline you proposed.

I think I prefer Tisha Darkblight, but she seems a bit OP (especially the Holy effect). I'd probably move her to 4 or 5 Mana, adjusting the stats accordingly.

About Animal Caretaker, I think I'd move her to a class with more tribes in their core identity, like Shaman (which has Totems, Elementals and Murlocs). Finally, that name doesn't feel very appropriate for a Paladin card, but this isn't too important.

I like how it makes you deckbuild very carefully, but I'd still think this is too strong: she can give you a ton of card advantage in the best case scenario, and since her effect says play and not draw, you will almost always reach it if you play her on curve without making much sacrifices. I'd probably go with a 4/4/4 statline or something similar to make her more nuanced and less OP if played on curve.

I'd like to see weapon types added at some point, but I don't think True Collector would work until that point.

Class Trainer is fine, but I prefer the legendary version, because it's an effect you only need to trigger once. I'd make two changes to her, though:

- Give her vanilla stats. The effect is very strong, but has a pretty hard requirement even for classes like Mage or Shaman.

- Give her a name. I mean, instead of The Class Trainer, something like Class Trainer Mariah or Class Trainer Lana, for instance.

A card that could very well exist in the game, but I the effect isn't very flashy and it isn't very flavorful, either.

Both are good, but I prefer Gift of N'zoth. I'm pretty sure it interacts with Amalgams like Demon said, so it's not an issue in that regard. As a minor coment, I'd definitely put it in the Darkmoon set.

I really like the effect, one of my favorites so far.

As a minor comment, I think you should change the name, as I believe Council implies several people (with a member of the council being a councilman or councilwoman). So I'd go with something like Moonforest Warden (or whichever title you prefer instead of Warden).

I really like Darkmoon Security. If you're afraid of the stats, you could always make it a 2/3.

Fin-friendly Bronzescale, on the other hand, doesn't speak to me, but I don't know why.

I think the new version reads a lot better. You should be ready to go, even if my issue with class identity still remains.

Switching the Battlecry and the HP was a pretty good change.

Keep in mind that the power level now is significantly lower, though. Not being able to chain infinite spells is a good change, but now you also need to pay 2 extra Mana for the card to have an effect at all in the turn it's played. I'm quite bad at balancing, but you could consider reducing the Cost to 6 Mana.

This is an improvement over the last iteration, but the effects seem a bit too disconnected. This is usually the case with Hero cards, but since yours has effectively three effects, it's a bit more prevalent.

My suggestion would be to make Shalamayne's effect trigger whenever you cast a Holy spell. This gives you more control over the effect and makes the Battlecry feel much more cohesive.

I like this card much better than your previous ones, especially the Hero Power part.

The only thing I'm not convinced about is the character. I always felt Admiral Proudmoore was a Paladin-Shaman hybrid, at least from his incarnation in Warcraft 3. A better character would be Tess Greymane, I believe, as she was already a Rogue-Hunter hybrid and had a lot of Secret synergies in the Monster Hunt mode.

It's a cool card, but has some problems. I don't really mind the double target, but it's a bit strange to have resurrection outside Priest. It also feels more Warlock than Warrior, but it has the Armor gain, so at least it's justified.

Count me among those who didn't understand the Battlecry XD I'd probably use Aegwynn, the Guardian as an inspiration for the wording. If you manage to make it understandable, you should be in good shape, as it is a very cool effect, even if it has the potential to be broken.

Regarding to class identity, it feels more Shaman than Rogue. Maybe the Hero Power could remedy that somehow, as the current one doesn't fit any class particularly.

The second version is much better, but I don't really see DH's identity besides the Demon tag the token has. Maybe Warlock would be more appropriate? I don't know.

This card isn't allowed to participate, I'm afraid, as the number of tokens is limited to three. That said, it's easy to fix it if both minions have Taunt and Lifesteal (and possibly a 3/3 statline, to compensate).

Despite that, I like the card, even if it could easily be monoclass Paladin.

Since you asked about it, I must say I really like the artwork. It's quite cool and fits both classes. Also, the overall card is one of the best at feeling dual class, so good job on that.

Talking about negatives, I have similar concerns as Demon:

• The Battlecry is too random. This could be easily be fixed by having a pre-defined token (like a 4/4 Bear or something) or by making it summon a Beast with a concrete cost, like Teacher's Pet.
• The HP uses a keyword which neither class uses. Besides that, the "If it survives" bit is redundant (Freeze is only relevant if the target survives anyway). I'd probably go with a Fire Shot with the effect "If the target survives, damage its neighbors", as it fixes both issues.

Like anchorm4n, your card fits both classes really well, so good job on that department.

My main issue is the Hero Power: while having Attack in your opponent's turn is quite novel, given it's only 1, it'll rarely have an impact. Honestly, I'd probably make it active during your turn, because having such a new concept being almost negligible feels worse than not having it at all.

I like the first version more both with the Battlecry and the HP.

Regarding the Battlecry, I wonder if it happens just twice or if it would keep going. Conceptually, I like the later (you have to keep making decisions of whether it's worth to lose Health or not), but it could get out of hand very easily, especially with the Hero Power and in the case of Mage (which has a lot of damaging spells). Maybe the card should cost more if this is the case. Also, an alternative effect could be: "Add three random spells from your class to your hand. They cost Health instead of Mana this turn."

Regarding the HP, I like how Warlock has an easier time triggering it, but Mage is better at abusing it.