the card itself isn't bad. To make it great you have to have 2 or 3 dragon in hand tho, which means you aren't probably in a good position to win the game.
I don't know if is good enough to see constructed play. I can see it as 1of in quest shaman as the battlecry hits only enemies so is nice for Shudder too. Maybe is good enough to be played in a highlander deck, not sure. I'd vote this card 2/5.
Finally a dragon that put some pressure versus slower decks. I still think that decks full of dragons just suck (the wonderful thing about the dragon mechanic in hearthstone is that you have to find the right amount of them to run to not make your deck too bad while still make the cards that require a dragon in hand reliable, just putting random things in your deck because there is "dragon" written on them is not what makes a dragon deck good) and that only one card good versus slower decks is not enough for them to work
This is a nice midrangey dragon! is Azure Drake, i've missed him.
Don't know if azure drake is still good enough, but finally we have a dragon that you don't feel bad to run for the "dragon in hand" requirement. Maybe is the 6th-7th dragon that highlander mage is looking for to make malygos more reliable?
The cost and the effect aren't bad, actually are quite nice. I don't think this card is good enough to see play in constructed, but when is generated by a random can be very good. In arena i think is a card that you see and you instantly pick
The card seems nice, equipping a weapon that you used means that you are equipping a weapon that you wanted to have in your deck, the fact that is a pirate is a plus, because the warrior legendary weapon can draw this.
I think it will be played as a 1of in pirate warrior
This card is just awful. You have to play a deck full of dragons, and big dragons at that (because all this effort to pulling out a faerie dragon sucks) to make it maybe worth it. I don't think a deck like that would make it to turn 6; even if it does, putting a big dragon on the board has no immediate impact, unless it has taunt, rush or something like that.
If this card didn't draw your opponent a card i'd still vote this 1/5, because it does i'd vote this a negative number if it was possible.
You can disrupt your quest druid opponent's sixth turn by playng this and negating their nourish turn...and after that losing because you included this card in your deck.
Very strong, 1 mana 1/2 that replace themselves are generally good; this card will give you another card that generally synergies with your deck already. 5/5
is a cheaper swipe that hits your board too (and where you tank the damage of the target with your face), i'd generally like it, but the fact that does hurt your board seems to go against the proactive deck that galakrond warrior seems to be
This is a very cool invoke card, we can see has a 4 attack weapon when played and a 1 attack after. Is cheap and does something on the board, so it helps evolving Galakrond to his final form sooner and warriors want to evolve Galakrond early
A 2/5 on turn 3 is not easy to deal with, especially in a deck that plays very aggressive from the first turn. When ship cannon was in standard there weren't many good pirates to make it work, but this expansion has many of them that are very good and cheap so this card will see play.
Another super niche tech card. it will see zero play in constructed, in arena is still a spider tank at least.
this is a very strong tempo cards for mech decks, i'm sure it will see some play
i don't think this is a card good enough to pressure slower decks, 3 health on turn 3 is what it keeps it behind, even bad invoke backstab kills it
A good tempo tool for dragon decks, which they surely need. If a dragon deck will have this active reliably on turn 3 it will see play
the card itself isn't bad. To make it great you have to have 2 or 3 dragon in hand tho, which means you aren't probably in a good position to win the game.
Is not the best card in the world, and is not intended to be. You don't feel too bad if you get it from random effects
I don't know if is good enough to see constructed play. I can see it as 1of in quest shaman as the battlecry hits only enemies so is nice for Shudder too. Maybe is good enough to be played in a highlander deck, not sure. I'd vote this card 2/5.
In arena i can see it being very good
Finally a dragon that put some pressure versus slower decks. I still think that decks full of dragons just suck (the wonderful thing about the dragon mechanic in hearthstone is that you have to find the right amount of them to run to not make your deck too bad while still make the cards that require a dragon in hand reliable, just putting random things in your deck because there is "dragon" written on them is not what makes a dragon deck good) and that only one card good versus slower decks is not enough for them to work
This is a nice midrangey dragon! is Azure Drake, i've missed him.
Don't know if azure drake is still good enough, but finally we have a dragon that you don't feel bad to run for the "dragon in hand" requirement. Maybe is the 6th-7th dragon that highlander mage is looking for to make malygos more reliable?
Seems like a very good arena card. i can't see it seeing much play in constructed at all.
The cost and the effect aren't bad, actually are quite nice. I don't think this card is good enough to see play in constructed, but when is generated by a random can be very good. In arena i think is a card that you see and you instantly pick
The card seems nice, equipping a weapon that you used means that you are equipping a weapon that you wanted to have in your deck, the fact that is a pirate is a plus, because the warrior legendary weapon can draw this.
I think it will be played as a 1of in pirate warrior
This card is just awful. You have to play a deck full of dragons, and big dragons at that (because all this effort to pulling out a faerie dragon sucks) to make it maybe worth it. I don't think a deck like that would make it to turn 6; even if it does, putting a big dragon on the board has no immediate impact, unless it has taunt, rush or something like that.
If this card didn't draw your opponent a card i'd still vote this 1/5, because it does i'd vote this a negative number if it was possible.
You can disrupt your quest druid opponent's sixth turn by playng this and negating their nourish turn...and after that losing because you included this card in your deck.
The murloc variance is too high to justify this card, too many of them are just too bad.
Very strong, 1 mana 1/2 that replace themselves are generally good; this card will give you another card that generally synergies with your deck already. 5/5
is a cheaper swipe that hits your board too (and where you tank the damage of the target with your face), i'd generally like it, but the fact that does hurt your board seems to go against the proactive deck that galakrond warrior seems to be
This is a very cool invoke card, we can see has a 4 attack weapon when played and a 1 attack after. Is cheap and does something on the board, so it helps evolving Galakrond to his final form sooner and warriors want to evolve Galakrond early
A 2/5 on turn 3 is not easy to deal with, especially in a deck that plays very aggressive from the first turn. When ship cannon was in standard there weren't many good pirates to make it work, but this expansion has many of them that are very good and cheap so this card will see play.
This a nice card for control warrior style of decks.
If you get the max value from this card it's insane, so this card rewards people that play around it.
Is a similar concept to rolling fireball, i think cards like this are very good for the game